90% of American households regularly use a microwave oven to
cook or reheat food, so it is quite possible that you have never been made
aware of the controversy surrounding it.
In certain circles, microwaves are thought to be very detrimental to
your health for a variety of reasons that their supporters vehemently refute.
The controversy stems from the methodology of the device,
which emits microwave radiation to essentially boil water molecules within food
to the point that the consequent steam heats the food from the inside-out; for
contrast, when you put your food into the traditional oven or cook on the
grill, what heats the food is the internal environment within the space. Microwave ovens raise two primary questions,
the first about their effect on the food and the second regarding the potential
hazards of the microwave emissions themselves.
It may well be the case, frankly, that the microwave debate
is similar to that of insecticides on crops or fluoride in the water supply, in
that its detractors see what they believe to be very logical concerns that are
swiftly contended by scientific studies which are intended to put to rest any
angst; the defense rests, so to speak, and supporters point to the research as
proof of safety, but the other side tends to zero in on the minute details such
as, according to the FDA, “Less is known about what happens to people exposed
to low levels of microwaves. Controlled,
long-term studies involving large numbers of people have not been conducted to
assess the impact of low level microwave energy [like from the microwave oven]
on humans.”
There is a very “ready-FIRE!-aim” mentality when it comes to
how we utilize the results of research in the United States. Seen very commonly with the pharmaceutical
industry and extending to many other fields, as well, something like the
microwave oven will be evaluated with the scrutiny to ensure that it can meet
current regulations, and then it will hit the market. The fact that many scientific questions about
the long-term effects of low-level microwave exposure are not yet answered –
questions that extend to cellphones and other wireless technology that use
microwaves by the way – makes it difficult to ignore when safety issues are
brought to the forefront. Is it just the
mere appearance of impropriety when consistent exposure to microwaves becomes
linked to, among many other things, insomnia, night sweats, and various sleep
disturbances; headaches and dizziness; swollen lymph nodes and a weakened
immune system; impaired cognition, depression and irritability; nausea and
appetite loss; vision and eye problems; frequent urination and extreme
thirst? Or is it a case of fire being
where smoke is located?
When it comes to microwaving food, plenty of immediately
detrimental effects have been scientifically documented in reliable sources by
reputable researchers. To name a few,
The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture revealed that microwaved
broccoli loses 97% of its anti-oxidant (cellular damage-preventing) qualities,
The Journal of Nutrition published that microwaving garlic inactivates its cancer
cell-destroying properties, and The Journal of Pediatrics reported that
microwaving breast milk eliminated most of its disease-fighting agents that
infants rely on while their immune systems are developing.
Just as alarming, if not more so, is what we are beginning
to learn about the mere exposure to microwaves.
Martin Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical
Sciences at Washington State University, has helped the lead the way to our
understanding of what microwaves do to the human body on a cellular level. He posits that it takes considerably less
than the current safety standard of microwave radiation to activate within our
cells, of the nervous system (brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and nerves)
especially, a process of gradual breakdown; in other words, just as it has been
suggested that microwaving food basically destroys nutrients from the
inside-out, consistent exposure to microwave radiation kills our cells from the
inside-out. Pall has compiled over 100
studies that reinforce his conclusions.
Professor Magda Havas, PhD, of Trent University in Ontario,
Canada, has added further perspective to Pall's research, confirming that
microwave radiation directly affects the heart.
She stated about her findings, “This is the first study that documents
immediate and dramatic changes in both heart rate and heart rate variability
caused by an approved device that generates microwaves at levels well below
federal guidelines in both Canada and the United States.” Havas has raised another red flag in stating
that microwaves leak radiation. “They
aren't meant to,” she has stated. “They
have a metal mesh that's supposed to protect the waves from leaking, but I've
tested over a dozen of the most popular brands, and every single one that I've
tested has leaked.”
A simple internet search will demonstrate scientific
counter-arguments to each of the above but, contrary to popular belief, when it
comes to health and the potential deleterious effects that devices like
microwave ovens have been shown to cause, the burden of proof is on the
proponents to establish microwave safety beyond a shadow of a doubt, instead of
the burden falling on what could be referred to as the “anti-microwave
movement” to substantiate a lack thereof.
Meanwhile, as further data is gathered by the scientific community,
would logic not dictate the use of other, more traditional cooking methods that
do not raise the same volume of concerns?
No comments:
Post a Comment